Senator Barak Obama has made it a point to present a more centrist appearance in social issues in order to appeal to the moderate-liberal portion of the electorate. Just as Senator Clinton, and Senator McCain pander to their constituents, so does Senator Obama, the only difference is that he also labels himself as the candidate of transparency.

Well, Politico.com published an article in which they explain that a questioner showing Senator Obama liberal stances in the early to mid 1990’s was really looked at or filled out by Senator Obama.

Last year, Politico.com brought up the issue of the questioner and the Senator’s liberal stances; but the Senator’s campaign was prompt to clarify that the Senator had not seeing the questioner, that it was filled by an aide who inadvertently mischaracterized the Candidate’s positions.

On this copy of the questioner we all can see that the Senator annotated it in his own handwriting. This appears to be evidence that the Senator not only saw the questioner, but also help fill it out. Based on this new evidence, it appears that the excuse presented by his campaign can hold no water, and it was just that, an excuse to deceive the electorate and attempt to maintain the Senator’s standing among moderates.

“We need to listen,” he said twice, the second time for emphasis and off the prepared text, “to the views and respect the collective will of our democratic allies. When we believe international action is necessary — whether military, economic or diplomatic — we will try to persuade our friends that we are right. But we, in return, must be willing to be persuaded by them.” John McCain

I agree with John McCain that we need to listen. We need to listen to:

1. Vaclav Klaus, Czech Republic’s President, when he said in the Glenn Beck program on CNN that Socialism and Communism does not work, that by allowing a Nation to be free, and to follow the capitalist way of life, a Nation can be economically independent. We need to also listen to him when he said that the Global Warming Movement is using fascist propaganda that wishes to crush their opponents instead of thriving in scientific dialogue; that when they start the name calling, and the ruining of their opponents reputations, they are showing their ignorance, and the weakness of their arguments.

2. We need to listen to France. France gets most of their energy from their nuclear power plants. It is time that we become energy independent, and the only way to do it, is by exploring the nuclear alternatively proven successful by the French, by exploring for oil off our coasts and in Alaska.

3. We also need to listen to France, when they voted down their liberal politicians and elected Nicolas Sarkozy, who made waves by declaring that he wanted France to be a friend of the United States, and by starting to create an American Style National Security Council.

4. We also need to listen to the Danes, who have had their troubles with Islamic Fascist. They are learning that there is no real way to make peace with terrorists.

5. We need to also listen to Australia when they told the Islamist within their Nation, that they needed to adapt to their way of life or leave.

6. In the economic front, we also need to listen to Germany and, they are lowering their corporate taxes to an average of 25%, since they realized that high taxes only ruin the Nation’s economy.

7. We need to learn from Mexico’s example, when they deport their illegal immigrants that invade their Nation through their southern border.

8. Senator McCain, you also need to listen to the voters. We do not want another McCain-Kennedy, or McCain-Lieberman, or McCain-Feingold. We as Americans need to listen, that much is true, we can learn a lot from Zarcozy, from Klaus, from the example of Germany and France, and from what is happening in “Londonistan”. Europe is being overrun by fanatic Islamics.

Yes, I agree that we need to listen to our friends overseas. It is amazing that most of the world is waking up to the reality of the world we live in, and to the fact that the conservative way of live is what made the United States great; while us here in America, in our blind attempt to be liked by all, have degenerate into the mess that we have today, our economy in crisis, criminals roaming the streets, illegal immigrants invading our Nation, etcetera.

We do not want torture to be used as an everyday practice of our intelligence services. That much we agree with you. But we believe that in some limited circumstances, and with the adequate supervision, water boarding is not only justified but recommended.

We also do not want the jail at Guantanamo Bay to be closed and the prisoners brought to the United States. We do however want the prisoners to undergo their trials right away.

If we listen, we might be able to learn something. We do not know everything, but we do know that Communism and Socialism do not work; we know that there is no way to talk a homicidal maniac out of his way and those Islamo-fascists are just that.

So the question now is: Senator McCain, are you going to listen to the conservatives within the Republican Party?

Dutch Parliament member Geert Wilders announced that his Anti Islam movie, Fitna, will be released at the end of this week. The American company that was to distribute the film chicken out and placed a disclaimer on their web site: https://www.fitnathemovie.com. They are saying that the site has being suspended while they, Network Solutions, investigate whether the movie violates their rules for use of their services.

The ironic part is that it appears that Wilders was trying to keep his short fifteen minutes film from the hands of the Dutch government by releasing in from a server in the United States.  Wilders is to start negotiating with Dutch broadcasters to attempt to release his film next week.

In the film, Geerts appears to portray the Koran as a book that incites its followers to violence against those who oppose its teachings.

Bloggers around the world are keeping an eye on the release.  

Let’s look the backgrownd of this landmark decision. In 1993, Jose Medellin was a seventeen year-old illegal alien when he and his cronies, six members of the “blacks and whites” gang, after initiating a new member by fighting each member of the gang for about five minutes, came across, kidnaped, raped, tortured, and killed two girls ages fourteen and sixteen; then, they had the gall to go to the house of a Peter Cantu, where they bragged about their exploits. Thankfully, someone called the police and they were arrested. After being sentenced to death, Medellin contacted the Mexican consul and they began to asist him. Their argument was that Medellin, under the Geneva convention, had the right to request assistance from his Nation of origin.

A long process of appeals was started by his lawers, and the Courts, denied them. In 2003, Mexico elevated the case to the ICJ, and brought suit alledging violation of their Geneva Convention rights to Medellin and to 53 other Mexican nationals sentenced to death in State Courts. It’s basis for this desition was that the police did not notify Medellin and 51 others of their right under the Convention of consular assistance.

The State Department and President Bush suggested that we should uphold the decisions of the ICJ. However, Texas Courts decided against it.

Previously, Germany brought an appeal to a Court in Virginia because of a prisoner sentenced to death, but when the appeal arrived, it was too late, the prisoner had being executed.

In this case, these creeps should have being executed a long time ago. These scumbags had no remorse when they killed two innocent girls sixteen years ago. The court, if I’m not mistaken is continuing with their plans of setting the date for the execution.

In an article that came out on September 11, 2001, and published by the New York Times, William Ayers confesses to “participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, of the Capitol building in 1971, the Pentagon in 1972.” He also summarized the ideals of the organization he belonged to as “''Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at,''

Mr. Ayers never did go to jail, since the statute of limitation for Federal crimes, except for death, is five years. He is currently a “distinguish” professor of education at the University of Illinois. They went underground after the bomb that his friends were making exploded and killed one injuring others (poetic justice?).

Some criminals do repent and feel contrite after the fact, those, I leave for God to judge. This piece of work, when asked if he would do it again said: ''I don't want to discount the possibility,'' ''I don't regret setting bombs,'' ''I feel we didn't do enough.''

It was Jonah Goldberg who first put the thoughts together. It appears that Senator Obama and Mr. Ayers are acquaintances at best, since both seem to have being members of a Board of directors of a charity in Chicago. According to www.factcheck.com, other newspapers have talk about the Obama-Ayers connection, but I do not see much of a problem with this association, other than the fact that this scumbag should not be teaching our youth.

Mr. Obama however, should choose better acquaintances if he wants to further his political career.

Democracy Now interviewed one of the many supporters of the Palestinians in the United States, Mr. Ali Abunimah, founder of Electronic Intifada, regarding our Candidates for President and their positions in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. As we well know, Palestine continues to attack Israel with suicide bombers, and is among the many Nations to call for the destruction of the Jewish State.

This interview is relevant because it sheds light on the mentality of our presidential candidates. The interview was published in Electronic Intifada on 25 January 2008 and in it Mr. Abunimah clearly criticizes all American candidates for President of the United States for cozying up to Israel, and not denouncing Israeli actions against the Palestinians. In addition, Mr. Abunimah specially condemns Senator Barack Obama “for how far he has moved to try to appease AIPAC and pro-Israel movements.”

So the question is: Is Mr. Abunimah saying that Senator Obama is pandering to those who support Israel when in reality, he is Pro Palestinian? I remember Mr. Obama saying that he supports Israel. Was that a lie to pacify us poor naïve Americans? Does he believewhat Farrakhan and Wright believe?

The prolific writer, Mr. Abunimah also published another article about Senator Obama, this one with pictures, in which he even more clearly expresses his disappointment over the apparent act of treachery by Mr. Obama. He Said: “If disappointing, given his historically close relations to Palestinian-Americans, Obama's about-face is not surprising. He is merely doing what he thinks is necessary to get elected and he will continue doing it as long as it keeps him in power.”